Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 13 results ...

Ameen, J R M, Neale, R H and Abrahamson, M (2003) An application of regression analysis to quality a claim for increased costs. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 156-65.

Arditi, D and Lee, D-E (2003) Assessing the corporate service quality performance of design build contractors using quality function deployment. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 175-85.

Dainty, A R J, Cheng, M-I and Moore, D R (2003) Redefining performance measures for construction project managers: an empirical evaluation. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 209-18.

Ekstrom, M A, Bjornsson, H C and Nass, C I (2003) Accounting for rater credibility when evaluating AEC subcontractors. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 197-208.

Fox, S (2003) A matrix to indicate the utility of technologies. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 187-96.

Liu, A M-M (2003) The quest for quality in public housing projects: a behaviour to outcome paradigm. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 147-58.

Myers, D (2003) The future of construction economics as an academic discipline. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 103-6.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: construction economics; university education; economic theory; sustainable construction; academic consensus
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000056117
  • Abstract:

    The contribution made by economic theory when studying construction-related subjects has a muddled history. This theme was carefully reviewed in Ofori (1994) where he bluntly concluded that: ’Construction economics cannot be regarded as a bona-fide subject’ (p. 304). This short note takes a retrospective look at George Ofori’s paper and suggests that during the subsequent period little has changed. This is despite the publication of government reports that stressed the importance of creating a culture of economic efficiency within construction and the need for the industry to become sustainable. This paper is informed by a brief survey of what is currently taught at British universities under the title of construction economics. Two points for debate emerge. The first is the worrying observation about the present state of play, as it seems that construction economics continues to lack any coherent conceptual structure. The second is the more promising suggestion that in the foreseeable future the sustainability agenda could provide the impetus necessary for construction economists to agree a common purpose and conceptual approach.

Ofori, G (2003) Preparing Singapore's construction industry for the knowledge-based economy: practices, procedures and performance. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 113-25.

Picken, D H and Ilozor, B D (2003) Height and construction costs of building in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 107-11.

Rooke, J D, Seymour, D E and Fellows, R F (2003) The claims culture: a taxonomy of attitudes in the industry. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 167-74.

Roy, R, Brown, J and Gaze, C (2003) Re-engineering the construction process in the speculative house building sector. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 137-46.

Shohet, I M, Lavy-Leibovich, S and Bar-On, D (2003) Integrated maintenance monitoring of hospital buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 219-29.

Tang, Y H and Ogunlana, S O (2003) Modelling the dynamic performance of a construction organization. Construction Management and Economics, 21(02), 127-36.